Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Idyl Wyld Regional
Stormwater Facility

City of Livonia
2
Overview
  • Background
  • Scope of Project
  • Planning & alternative development
  • Final Design
  • Construction
  • Project costs & grant funding


3
Background
  • Livonia is part of 2 (out of 7) Rouge River subwatersheds
    • Upper Rouge Subwatershed
    • Middle 3 Rouge Subwatershed
  • Active participant in both subwatershed planning efforts


4
Background
  • Streambank erosion is significant problem throughout the City
    • Fully developed, urbanized community
    • Many enclosed drains & concrete-lined channels
    • Erosion is threatening property
    • Resident complaints
  • Goals in Upper Rouge SWMP include:
    • Reduce excessive peak flows
    • Restore aesthetics
    • Improve habitat
5
Background
  • Livonia obtained a Rouge River Grant
    • to demonstrate the effectiveness of a regional storm water retention/treatment facility at its Idyl Wyld golf course
  • Project to reduce negative impacts of storm water runoff in an urbanized area
    • Attenuating flows
    • Reducing sedimentation
    • Improving aesthetics and habitat
6
 
7
 
8
Scope of Project
  • Characterize peak flows
    • Computer model
  • Develop alternatives
  • Design
  • Construct facilities
  • Evaluate project performance
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Preliminary Design - Objectives
  • Minimize cost
  • Simple operation & maintenance
  • Address safety concerns
  • Phasing – to max. funding opportunities
  • Bio-remediation to extent possible
  • Work within existing golf course
    • Size constraints
    • Play of course
14
 
15
Improvement 1 - Benefits
  • Reduce erosion a sedimentation within Idyl Wyld as well as downstream
  • Improve safety of water course
  • Enhance aesthetics
  • Reduce pollutants
16
 
17
Improvement 2 - Benefits
  • Attenuate flows for a wide range of rainfall events
  • Allow side-by-side comparison of off-line storage technologies
  • Naturalize golf course, improve aesthetics
  • Provide habitat
  • Reduce pollutants
18
 
19
Improvement 3 - Benefits
  • Reduce peak flows during large rainfall events
    • 23% during the 10-yr, 1-hr storm
  • Impact golf course
    • portions of holes 5 and 17 submerged for 24-48 hours
20
 
21
Improvement 4 – Benefits
  • Reduce peak flows during large rainfall events
    • 27% during the 10-yr, 1-hr storm
  • Impact golf course
    • portions of holes 3, 5 and 17 submerged for 24-48 hours
22
Selected Project
  • Combination of improvements 1, 2 & 3
    • Channel restructuring & armoring
    • Off-line storage
    • Weir/bridge structure
  • Reduce peak flow
    • 33% reduction during 10-yr, 1-hr storm
  • Preliminary design completed in 2001
23
 
24
 
25
Final Design
  • Final design delayed due to City’s funding concerns
    • Second Rouge River grant
    • Clean Michigan Initiative (CMI) grant
  • Timing was critical and challenging:
    • Second Rouge grant to be utilized by 12/31/04
    • MDEQ notified City of CMI application approval 12/03; IAA in 4/04;
    • MDEQ did not approve design until 9/04
26
Final Design
  • Had to balance concerns of each grant agency, i.e., Wayne Co. & MDEQ
  • Overall concepts remained the same, but some details changed:
    • Incorporation of  6 Newberry Weirs per MDEQ
    • Softening of channel treatments per MDEQ
  • MDEQ contributed design expertise via its own consultants – Roseboom & Watson
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
32
 
33
 
34
 
35
 
36
Construction
  • Commenced in September 2004
  • Approximately 70% complete at this time
  • Anticipated completion July 2005
37
Construction
38
Construction
39
Construction
40
Construction
41
Construction
42
Vegetation
  • Establish a mixture of wetland plants similar to tall golf course rough
    • tolerant of wet conditions
    • Bulrush, sedges, rye as predominant plants
    • Emergent wetland species
    • Wildflowers
  • Planting to be done in Spring 2005


43
Vegetation
44
Vegetation
45
Project Challenges
  • Balancing grant funding sources
  • Delays caused increased design costs
    • Golf course made changes to their master plan, requiring modification of plans/specs
  • MDEQ permitting process
    • Weir structure was controversial
    • Internal disagreement between divisions
46
Project Evaluation
  • To commence in July 2005
  • Consists of:
    • Photo-documentation
    • Monitoring of channel cross section to determine if it remains stable
47
Construction Costs
  • Construction:  $1,399,500
    • Construction: $1,189,500
    • Const. observ. & admin: $   156,000
    • Post-const. Evaluation: $     54,000
  • Grant Funding:
    • Round 1 Rouge Grant:   $13,500/$15,000
    • Round 2 Rouge Grant: $345,850/$691,700
    • CMI Grant: $669,000/$892,000
  •  73% Grant/27% Local Match
48
Questions